Posted in Reroll
December 11th, 2019

California Could Declare THC A Risk For Pregnant Individuals

Rerolled from a High Times Original Article


LOS ANGELES (AP) — More than three years after California voters broadly legalized marijuana, a state panel is considering if its potent, high-inducing chemical — THC — should be declared a risk to pregnant women and require warnings.

Studies have indicated that a rising
number of mothers-to-be have turned to marijuana products for relief
from morning sickness and headaches, though it’s effectiveness has not
been backed by science.

Cannabis industry officials say too
little sound research is available on THC to support such a move and
warn that it could make marijuana companies a target for lawsuits with
unverified claims of injuries from pot use during pregnancy.

“That seems like an open-ended checkbook. How do we defend ourselves?” said Los Angeles dispensary owner Jerred Kiloh, who heads the United Cannabis Business Association, an industry group.

Lawyers looking for a quick buck will say “give us $10,000 or we are going to take you into a long court case,” he added.

The
California Cannabis Industry Association echoed that fear, noting that
pot’s standing as an illegal drug at the federal level has choked off
research by government agencies. Those studies are needed to determine
if THC poses health risks for pregnant women.

“Good policy and consumer protections are based on facts and data,” spokesman Josh Drayton said.

The
meeting Wednesday of the obscure state Developmental and Reproductive
Toxicant Identification Committee in Sacramento will focus on whether
THC causes “reproductive toxicity.” The panel is made up of scientists
appointed by the governor.

An affirmative finding would make THC
one of hundreds of chemicals judged to cause cancer or birth defects
that the state requires to carry warning labels, such as arsenic and
lead.

The review is being carried out under the umbrella of the
Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, better known as
Proposition 65. It requires warning labels for chemicals judged as
dangerous and allows residents, advocacy groups and attorneys to sue on
behalf of the state and collect a portion of civil penalties for failure
to provide warnings.

The 1986 law has been credited with weeding
out cancer-causing chemicals from products but also faulted for setting
the stage for legal shakedowns.

Since 2009, the state has listed marijuana smoke as being known to cause cancer, similar to tobacco smoke.

“The
expansion of Proposition 65 as it relates to cannabis is premature and
lacks both the facts and the data that would justify this move,” Drayton
said.

The U.S. surgeon general warned in August that smoking
marijuana is dangerous for pregnant women and their developing babies.
Mainstream medicine advises against pot use in pregnancy because of
studies suggesting it might cause premature birth, low birth weight or
other health problems, but many of those studies were in animals or had
findings that were open to dispute.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse is paying for several studies on marijuana use during pregnancy.

If
the California panel declares pot a risk for pregnant women, it’s not
clear what the immediate impact would be on the state’s legal pot
industry.

Presumably, packaging would need to be changed over
time to carry warning labels for pregnant women. But such requirements
would likely take additional steps by agencies that oversee marijuana
regulation and packaging.

Even products containing CBD, a trendy ingredient extracted from marijuana or hemp, can contain trace amounts of THC.

By Michael R. Blood

The post California Could Declare THC A Risk For Pregnant Individuals appeared first on High Times.


Rerolled from High Times